| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/793164
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/793164
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As discussed in #gentoo-portage yesterday: After a new EAPI has been
approved, there is a period during which there is no stable Portage
version supporting the new EAPI, and ebuilds for the new EAPI should
not be stabilised during that period. Add a new "eapis-testing" key
to layout.conf, so that development tools can warn about it.
Suggested-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/682294
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Introduce an additional proxied="" attribute to make it possible
to explicitly distinguish proxied maintainers from regular maintainers.
This is supposed to resolve false positives in the QA check responsible
for detecting leftover proxy-maint project usage. Currently it wrongly
assumes that all Gentoo devs (as in people with @gentoo.org) have direct
push access and therefore don't need a proxy.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/760923
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Acked-by: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
Acked-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change the handling of slave repositories to the usual notion of 'slave
overrides master'.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Provide a combined description for every status that explains what it
means, how it's used by linting tools and how it affects stabilization
requests.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm not aware of any profiles that should be set to 'degraded', so let's
focus on the immediate problem of stable/testing. It will also probably
make sense to wait before we start using the third state.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While it should technically be ignored, I don't think it's a good idea
to encourage developers using it for their own purposes.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'Testing' has generally nicer meaning than 'unstable'.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In Gentoo terms, 'testing' and 'unstable' are mostly synonymous,
so using the two names for different purposes is confusing. Use
'transitional' instead.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is really no different from marking the profiles exp, and there
seems no value in having this controlled in two places.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/717230
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove the policy part from GLEP 81, making it into a pure technical
specification. The policy will now be defined by the QA team
as a regular tree policy. Since the planned policy updates make it
less restrictive, there is really no need to hammer it at GLEP level.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/703314
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
[Fixed name of CC-BY-SA-4.0; it is "International", not "Unported".]
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
GLEP 76 says that new documentation must be released under CC-BY-SA
version 4.0. Update the guidelines (GLEP 1) and the template (GLEP 2)
to agree with this policy.
Drop the wording about older GLEPs in the public domain or released
under the OPL, because all of them have been updated.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Acked-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@gentoo.org>
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/637328
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/646068
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Globally replace URLs pointing to gmane.org or marc.theaimsgroup.com,
preferably by archives.gentoo.org if the article is available there.
As suggested by robbat2, also add the Message-ID and bibliographical
information, in order to have a permanent reference to the message.
Notes on single GLEPs:
- GLEP 40: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/31060 had
pointed to the first message of the thread (by g2boojum), not to
stuart's followup. Corrected.
- GLEP 57: Two messages in gentoo-dev from January/February 2005 and
one message in gentoo-security from April 2003 are missing from
Gentoo archives. Use marc.info instead.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fill in the reference implementation section. Reduce the requirements
for cutoffs to support only multiples of 4, as there is no point
in making the implementation more complex for something we aren't using
anyway. Fix a typo.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As discussed in 2019-09-08 council meeting.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/687420
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes: 9f2fa9195dc7c226de1bdd3625ff28b757ef4910
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add missing TAR-PORTABILITY reference to the citation from the article.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/689416
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/687420
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Update the reference implementation section to indicate that it has been
committed already.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/687420
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/609338
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/617612
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/679250
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Update the wording of GLEP 48 to provide clear information on what kind
of disciplinary actions can be issued by QA and under what circumstances
they can be exercised.
According to the old wording, QA could only request 're-evaluating
commit rights' from ComRel. This is very unclear, and has been a source
of confusion. Firstly, it is unclear whether ComRel merely serves
as a proxy executing the QA team's decision, or whether it is supposed
to make independent judgment (which would be outside its scope).
Secondly, it suggests that the only disciplinary action possible would
be 're-evaluating commits rights' which sounds like an euphemism for
removing commit access permanently.
The new wording aims to make things clear, and make QA able to issue
short-term disciplinary actions without involving ComRel, similarly
to how Proctors work. Explanation for the individual points follows.
Firstly, it aims to clearly define the domain of QA actions, and set
a better distinction between QA and ComRel. In this context, QA
is concerned whenever the developer's action technically affects Gentoo,
which includes breaking user systems, Infrastructure tooling, other
packages, etc. ComRel/Proctors on the other hand are concerned
in actions having social consequences rather than technical.
Secondly, it clearly defines that the QA team can issue a temporary ban
(with the upper limit of 14 days) via an internal team vote. In this
case there is no necessity of involving ComRel, and QA can request
executing this disciplinary decision straight from Infra.
Thirdly, the old policy is clarified as applying to permanent bans.
In case of repeated offenses, QA requests ComRel to evaluate the case.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/684192
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Following the recent mailing list discussion indicating that developers
are taking GLEP 63 as only source of truth about OpenPGP keys, and can
make assumption that if encryption key is not listed there they should
not have one. Amend the specification to extend it beyond the previous
limited scope of commit signing, and require an encryption key
appropriately. This matches the GnuPG defaults.
While at it, add a recommendation that the primary key is certify-only.
Other usage is implicitly discouraged anyway via requiring subkeys.
Originally this recommendation was omitted as I wasn't aware that gpg
had a (hidden) option to change usage of existing keys.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681802
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|