| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/875053
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All branches build fine with it, tested runtime a bit with 525
and "seems" fine at least for it too (not that I really use new
kernel branches until .5+ and gentoo-kernel bump).
For the now-unsupported 390 and if unpatched, that means planned
LTS 6.1 will likely be the kernel to stay on (forever) when 5.15
reaches end of life.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No real impact, just to have less unneeded differences.
wrt 510 there's technically dbus.conf, but realistically nobody
uses nvidia-powerd with older drivers and does not need a revbump
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Oops, but doesn't impact anything.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Same as nvidia-settings-390.144-raw-ldflags.patch, but applied
to kernel-module-source. Not a perfect fix given profiles don't
define LDFLAGS_arm64, but that's not a high priority and can
wait for nvidia's fix.
Note that modules are still generally fragile and untested with
llvm toolchain.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/885483
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also note that it's ok to ignore if it works, hard to say how
everything behaves on different hardware and this is not hard
requirements (may start working again with new kernel/driver too).
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unsure about exact status for this (was reportedly fixed in newer
drivers?), but seen a user have issues with it on 470.161.03.
Was still warning about this in 0/390, but also add 0/470 at least
(albeit this only check if set by default).
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
... 510.85.02, 515.65.01
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/884045
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note that not giving runtime testing to 0/390 anymore given my
old hardware has gotten unreliable, please report if any notable
regressions.
But likely the last time have to look at a new 0/390 release given
NVIDIA support is ending this month. Won't be removed from ::gentoo
anytime soon but will get masked as a unsupported opt-in whenever
potential new security issues hit.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Obsolete new feature branch, please use production 515 or >=525 intead.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Masked beta version replaced by 525.60.11, no reason to keep.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/881025
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Non-beta new production branch and potential future stable
candidate (albeit 515.86.01 will be stable before it).
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
New is stable for x86 now.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
And drop now unnecessary conditional patches for kernel 6.0 support.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
someday it will be stable for x86.. someday...
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/880879
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove the IBT warning, should now work in-theory with this
version (untested, please report if still have issues).
Also get to replace the no-gtk2 patch by BUILD_GTK2LIB=
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reword a bit and add nvidia open issue link.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Kernel upstream is talking about enabling this by default (possibly
in 6.2), and users may be curious as to why they can't enable a
security feature.
Hoping nvidia will come up with something at least before 6.2.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|