Roll Call: =========== Betelgeuse: here Cardoe: here dertobi123: here dev-zero: here leio: here lu_zero: here tanderson(secretary): here ulm: here Topics: =========== - Short discussion of EAPI 3 progress. Zac Medico(zmedico) commented that while no progress had been made, a tracker bug had been made[1] for those interested in providing patches for and tracking the progress of the EAPI 3 implementation. Ciaran McCreesh noted that paludis is ready for EAPI 3 whenever the portage implementation is finished. - Default contents of ACCEPT_LICENSE(license filtering). GLEP23[2] provided a method for users to select what licenses they are willing to accept based on a ACCEPT_LICENSE configuration variable. In addition it provided for 'license groups' so users could accept or decline to use software of a certain license type. What GLEP 23 did not specify was the default value of ACCEPT_LICENSE. Conclusion: The council unanimously voted to have the default ACCEPT_LICENSE value as ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA". - BASH 4 in EAPI 3. There were three parts to this topic: 1) Unlocking of feature requests for EAPI 3. 2) Allowing BASH 4 features in EAPI 3 ebuilds. 3) Allowing BASH 4 features in all ebuilds with EAPIs >= 3 after a fixed amount of time in gentoo-x86(Overlays could begin use immediately). Conclusion: By a 4-3 decision the council voted not to open the feature list for EAPI 3. - The banning of igli(Steve Long) from #gentoo-council. Tiziano Muller(dev-zero) banned igli from #-council for what he called repeated trolling after private warnings. The ban was later reversed by Doug Goldstein(Cardoe) because it had not been put to a council vote as all bans in #-council are. Conclusion: No decision yet, the council decided to discuss this issue privately on the council@ alias so that precious meeting time is not spent. - Define EAPI development/deployment cycles. Various Council members expressed support for Ciaran McCreesh's EAPI development guidelines as outlined in [3]. However, the discussion reached no conclusion and quickly spiraled into a discussion of the removal of Ciaran McCreesh's bugzilla privileges. - Removal of Ciaran McCreesh's(ciaranm) bugzilla permissions. At some point in the last year ciaranm's bugzilla permissions were removed. He filed a bug about the issue(#273759) and was talking about moving PMS off of Gentoo Infrastructure, a move that some council members were strongly opposed to. When asked about the permissions, Ciaran had no objections to waiting a few days for the infra to complete an investigation into who removed the access and for what reason. Conclusion: The council voted to reinstate Ciaran's editbugs privileges. Ned Ludd (solar) noted that infra will investigate who removed the privileges in the first place, and asked for not changing bugzilla privileges before this is completed. [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273620 [2]: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0023.html [3]: http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_d3a4758c455fded00608e891f525d3cc.xml