diff options
| author |   Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org> | 2021-07-09 11:47:24 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org> | 2021-07-09 12:37:13 +0100 |
| commit | aa660b094c6a29bc46d6018139904d82e1e7667b (patch) | |
| tree | e95896e6f3c132d9da6f829e7bedf4411dce77c8 /dev-lang | |
| parent | www-servers/tomcat: bump to 8.5.69 (diff) | |
| download | gentoo-aa660b094c6a29bc46d6018139904d82e1e7667b.tar.gz gentoo-aa660b094c6a29bc46d6018139904d82e1e7667b.tar.bz2 gentoo-aa660b094c6a29bc46d6018139904d82e1e7667b.zip | |
dev-lang/lua: keyword 5.1.5-r106 for -riscv
Certain string.format operations produce clearly wrong results, for
instance "string.format("%d", 2^63)" gives -9223372036854775808 on
amd64 yet 9223372036854775807 on riscv. This is the same as with 5.2 but
unlike the latter, it doesn't trigger a test failure here due to
much smaller test coverage of 5.1.
This might be a formatting-only problem because the binary representation
of 2^63 looks the same (and OK) on both arches, not to mention that for
newer Lua versions 2^63 is already considered out of range for '%d'
- but err on the side of caution for now.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'dev-lang')
| -rw-r--r-- | dev-lang/lua/lua-5.1.5-r106.ebuild | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/dev-lang/lua/lua-5.1.5-r106.ebuild b/dev-lang/lua/lua-5.1.5-r106.ebuild index eed2660a7619..234289c293b4 100644 --- a/dev-lang/lua/lua-5.1.5-r106.ebuild +++ b/dev-lang/lua/lua-5.1.5-r106.ebuild @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ SRC_URI="https://www.lua.org/ftp/${P}.tar.gz" LICENSE="MIT" SLOT="5.1" -KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 arm arm64 hppa ~ia64 ~mips ppc ppc64 ~s390 sparc x86 ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux ~ppc-macos ~x64-macos ~sparc-solaris ~sparc64-solaris ~x64-solaris ~x86-solaris" +KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 arm arm64 hppa ~ia64 ~mips ppc ppc64 -riscv ~s390 sparc x86 ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux ~ppc-macos ~x64-macos ~sparc-solaris ~sparc64-solaris ~x64-solaris ~x86-solaris" IUSE="+deprecated readline" COMMON_DEPEND=" |