| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change was created by running the following command::
ekeyword ^ia64 */*/*.ebuild
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/931117
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/931115
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Remove patch that is now included in 1.6.1
- Tests pass
[sam: Add USE=examples.]
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/922397
Signed-off-by: Christopher Fore <csfore@posteo.net>
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/36365
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matoro Mahri <matoro_gentoo@matoro.tk>
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
[sam: add bug #868306 ref.]
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825078
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825758
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/868306
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All of these will be using app-alternatives/lex anyway as they're not unsetting
YACC or LEX, so make the dep reflect reality.
(Included both YACC and LEX out of conservatism.)
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[sam: Note that the examples aren't installed anyway.]
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/906137
Signed-off-by: Violet Purcell <vimproved@inventati.org>
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/31000
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It makes sense for base-system@ to maintain this anyway, but also
see recent gentoo-dev ML post where inactivity caused some concern.
Also, not being in sync with sys-auth/pambase is confusing.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Would give wrong result in spool dir test otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/867991
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While split-usr support remains tenuous, dropping it from
PAM is tantamount to removing it from Gentoo entirely and
requires something more like a news item and a lot of
planning.
Also, really, the resultant ebuild cleanup from
dropping it doesn't justify the gratuitous breakage:
cost & reward.
That said, I would strongly recommend at this
point that split-usr users use an initramfs
or actively participate in helping to solve
split-usr bugs (see e.g. bug 443590) as at
some point, the dam is going to break and
maintainers may get fed up. It's already
a barely-supported situation.
Obligatory: none of this has anything
to do with "merged /usr".
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/443590
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/868306
See: 2ff9dcc3275e4f37a44eaf707fce9f53c13c2e82
See: aeb526aa3b0875745fa0af6c754ded21af68658b
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|