1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
|
<gyakovlev> !proj council
<willikins> (council@gentoo.org) dilfridge, gyakovlev, patrick, slyfox, ulm, whissi, williamh
<gyakovlev> agenda for today: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/a0566763e80a136251d039baf4acdd8e
<gyakovlev> let's start it with 1) Roll Call
<slyfox> yay!
* slyfox here
* ulm here
* gyakovlev here
* WilliamH here
* dilfridge here
* bonsaikitten here
<gyakovlev> Whissi: ping
* dilfridge asks the easter bunny to hunt down Whissi
<gyakovlev> ok waiting til 12:04 till ping reply and going on.
<slyfox> sounds good
* Whissi here
<gyakovlev> ok going on, all here
<gyakovlev> agenda is kinda empty this time so moving on straight to bugs
<gyakovlev> bug 662982
<willikins> gyakovlev: https://bugs.gentoo.org/662982 "[TRACKER] New default locations for the Gentoo repository, distfiles, and binary packages"; Gentoo Linux, Current packages; CONF; zmedico:dev-portage
<gyakovlev> still depends on bug 574752 where single comment was added after the friendly ping
<willikins> gyakovlev: https://bugs.gentoo.org/574752 "Rename portage-YYYYMMDD.tar* snapshots with gentoo-YYYYMMDD.tar*"; Gentoo Infrastructure, Other; IN_P; mgorny:infra-bugs
* ulm wonders who uses diffs between snapshots
<gyakovlev> any comments, suggestions?
<ulm> I mean, using diffs requires a recent snapshot, like less than a month old
* WilliamH has no idea who is using diffs
<ulm> and wouldn't one just go with the existing snapshot then, followed by rsync?
<Whissi> There are people just updating via webrsync
<slyfox> i used emerge-delta-webrsync when i had dialup internet
<Whissi> And rsync is a pain since verification for systems with slow disks
<gyakovlev> yeah I used delta snapshots on metered connection in 200x, it was nice, but idk how many users we have today.
<slyfox> infra should be able to handle it on their own
<mgorny> maybe we should start providing git-bundle snapshots ;-)
<Whissi> slyfox: Sure but the idea is that someone is watching those bugs because otherwise there is no progress ;-)
<slyfox> i wonder if we should just close the tracker. All the locations already changed, no?
<gyakovlev> btw I know some arch tarballs (ppc64) still use old locations, so probably we have more blockers actually, but amd64 tarballs are switched.
<Whissi> But I don't understand why new tarballs are 100% larger. Maybe we should just do the switch to the new names. This way the new tarball would have the old new name and everything else would be the same.
<gyakovlev> I pinged matts88 about it, not sure if he did anything
<slyfox> worth filing a bug?
<ulm> including the date in the topdir name doesn't seem strictly necessary
<ulm> at least it had worked without it before
<WilliamH> I imagine that's the issue, the date in the top dir name.
<gyakovlev> yes it is, there was a bug with discussion why it was required, but I can't find it right now.
<Whissi> Let's work on this with infra until next meeting. No need to do it now.
<gyakovlev> ok, I'll add another blocker and monitor the bug.
<gyakovlev> moving on
<gyakovlev> 3. Open floor
<gyakovlev> anyone?
<gyakovlev> ok, let's wait till for five minutes, till 19:20 UTC
<gyakovlev> I can't type today properly, sorry for mistakes =)
<Whissi> Easter too much celebrated? :-)
<gyakovlev> no =), just broken sleep pattern due to being in the same place for 3 weeks in a row without going out really. feels weird.
<gyakovlev> ok guys, nothing for open floor, meeting closed
<ulm> gyakovlev: thanks for chairing
* gyakovlev bangs the gong
|
GitWeb
