1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
|
[2024-07-21T22:00:47+03:00] <@ulm> meeting time
[2024-07-21T22:00:51+03:00] <@ulm> !proj council
[2024-07-21T22:00:51+03:00] <willikins> (council@gentoo.org) arthurzam, dilfridge, mgorny, robbat2, sam, soap, ulm
[2024-07-21T22:00:57+03:00] <@robbat2> present
[2024-07-21T22:00:58+03:00] <@ulm> who wants the chair?
[2024-07-21T22:01:01+03:00] -*- dilfridge here
[2024-07-21T22:01:06+03:00] -*- soap here
[2024-07-21T22:01:11+03:00] <@dilfridge> always who asks
[2024-07-21T22:01:26+03:00] <@ulm> ok, I can take it
[2024-07-21T22:01:27+03:00] <@arthurzam> I can chair
[2024-07-21T22:01:37+03:00] <@ulm> arthurzam: go ahead :)
[2024-07-21T22:02:01+03:00] <@arthurzam> Agenda for today: https://marc.info/?l=gentoo-project&m=172094483522305&w=2
[2024-07-21T22:02:01+03:00] <@arthurzam> (since our mail archives are down)
[2024-07-21T22:02:06+03:00] <@arthurzam> 1. Roll Call
[2024-07-21T22:02:10+03:00] -*- arthurzam here
[2024-07-21T22:02:12+03:00] -*- ulm here
[2024-07-21T22:02:13+03:00] -*- dilfridge here
[2024-07-21T22:02:15+03:00] -*- sam_ here
[2024-07-21T22:02:15+03:00] -*- mgorny here
[2024-07-21T22:02:18+03:00] <@robbat2> here
[2024-07-21T22:02:24+03:00] -*- soap here
[2024-07-21T22:02:31+03:00] <@arthurzam> 7 yes, all here
[2024-07-21T22:02:44+03:00] <@arthurzam> 2. Constitute the new council
[2024-07-21T22:02:57+03:00] <@arthurzam> - Decide on time of meetings. The previous council had its meetings
[2024-07-21T22:02:57+03:00] <@arthurzam> on the 2nd Sunday of every month at 19:00 UTC
[2024-07-21T22:03:04+03:00] <@arthurzam> does this match everyone?
[2024-07-21T22:03:13+03:00] <@robbat2> works for me
[2024-07-21T22:03:14+03:00] <@dilfridge> fine for me
[2024-07-21T22:03:17+03:00] <@soap> fine for me
[2024-07-21T22:03:17+03:00] <@ulm> fine
[2024-07-21T22:03:20+03:00] <@sam_> sure
[2024-07-21T22:03:21+03:00] <@mgorny> likewise
[2024-07-21T22:03:32+03:00] <@arthurzam> nice, good for all, so let's continue it
[2024-07-21T22:03:41+03:00] <@arthurzam> - Vote for continuing last council's workflow considering sending
[2024-07-21T22:03:41+03:00] <@arthurzam> a call for agenda items (two weeks in advance), sending the
[2024-07-21T22:03:41+03:00] <@arthurzam> agenda (one week in advance) and have the meeting focussed, i.e.
[2024-07-21T22:03:41+03:00] <@arthurzam> have major discussions on the gentoo-project mailing list prior
[2024-07-21T22:03:41+03:00] <@arthurzam> to the meeting
[2024-07-21T22:03:54+03:00] <@arthurzam> I don't think anyone here has issues with it
[2024-07-21T22:04:01+03:00] <@dilfridge> I think nobody wants to change that
[2024-07-21T22:04:07+03:00] <@arthurzam> And now to the hard part:
[2024-07-21T22:04:07+03:00] <@arthurzam> - Appoint chairmen for this term's meetings
[2024-07-21T22:04:13+03:00] <@soap> fine with me
[2024-07-21T22:04:17+03:00] <@ulm> I can take Jan and Feb
[2024-07-21T22:04:27+03:00] <@arthurzam> I can take Jul & Aug
[2024-07-21T22:04:27+03:00] <@dilfridge> nov and dec for me
[2024-07-21T22:04:30+03:00] <@sam_> I'll do dec/jan
[2024-07-21T22:04:34+03:00] <@soap> I'd suggest replacing all the old with new members 1:1?
[2024-07-21T22:04:35+03:00] <@sam_> uh
[2024-07-21T22:04:46+03:00] <@robbat2> i'm going to abstain on chair role, because I expect a lot in shutting down the foundation
[2024-07-21T22:04:58+03:00] <@dilfridge> sam_: I take oct you take dec
[2024-07-21T22:05:01+03:00] <@sam_> ok
[2024-07-21T22:05:04+03:00] <@arthurzam> I'm quite easy to move if needed :)
[2024-07-21T22:05:30+03:00] <@ulm> sam_: I could take Mar if you want Jan
[2024-07-21T22:05:43+03:00] <@mgorny> err, could we do it keeping adjacent months to one person?
[2024-07-21T22:05:53+03:00] <@dilfridge> we do
[2024-07-21T22:06:07+03:00] -*- dilfridge hands mgorny some coffee
[2024-07-21T22:06:16+03:00] <@mgorny> so who took Sep?
[2024-07-21T22:06:21+03:00] <@dilfridge> noone yet
[2024-07-21T22:06:29+03:00] <@soap> I was august last time
[2024-07-21T22:06:34+03:00] <@soap> IIRC
[2024-07-21T22:06:34+03:00] <@mgorny> yet Aug and Oct are taken!
[2024-07-21T22:06:41+03:00] <@mgorny> hence, "we do" is false
[2024-07-21T22:06:58+03:00] <@arthurzam> soap: I can give you aug, I don't really care
[2024-07-21T22:06:58+03:00] <@sam_> shall we just do soap's suggestion? I don't really care when as long as it's not october or feb
[2024-07-21T22:07:13+03:00] <@dilfridge> please no january for me, otherwise I'm fine
[2024-07-21T22:07:16+03:00] <@soap> I will do aug/sep then
[2024-07-21T22:07:32+03:00] <@dilfridge> and july not either
[2024-07-21T22:07:36+03:00] -*- mgorny will take any two adjacent months
[2024-07-21T22:07:46+03:00] <@arthurzam> mgorny: may/june?
[2024-07-21T22:07:51+03:00] <@mgorny> sure, wfm
[2024-07-21T22:08:13+03:00] <@arthurzam> sam_: dilfridge what have you selected between you 2?
[2024-07-21T22:08:30+03:00] <@dilfridge> last was, I do oct & nov
[2024-07-21T22:08:52+03:00] <@sam_> then I'll do dec/jan, yeah?
[2024-07-21T22:08:56+03:00] <@dilfridge> ++
[2024-07-21T22:09:01+03:00] <@sam_> if ulm is fine with that too
[2024-07-21T22:09:01+03:00] <@ulm> feb/mar for me then
[2024-07-21T22:09:04+03:00] <@sam_> ok
[2024-07-21T22:09:16+03:00] <@arthurzam> ok, so in summary:
[2024-07-21T22:09:45+03:00] <@arthurzam> arthurzam, soap, soap, dilfridge, dilfridge, sam_, sam_, ulm, ulm, arthurzam, mgorny, mgorny
[2024-07-21T22:10:17+03:00] <@arthurzam> So let's put official vote for it:
[2024-07-21T22:10:17+03:00] <@arthurzam> 2. Constitute the new council
[2024-07-21T22:10:20+03:00] -*- arthurzam yes
[2024-07-21T22:10:25+03:00] -*- sam_ yes
[2024-07-21T22:10:26+03:00] -*- soap yes
[2024-07-21T22:10:32+03:00] -*- robbat2 aye
[2024-07-21T22:10:34+03:00] -*- dilfridge yes
[2024-07-21T22:10:35+03:00] -*- ulm yes
[2024-07-21T22:10:42+03:00] -*- mgorny yes
[2024-07-21T22:10:48+03:00] <@arthurzam> 7 yes, passed
[2024-07-21T22:11:04+03:00] <@arthurzam> 3. Change GLEP 84 status to Final
[2024-07-21T22:11:04+03:00] <@arthurzam> bug 914982
[2024-07-21T22:11:05+03:00] <willikins> https://bugs.gentoo.org/914982 "GLEP 84: Standard format for package.mask files"; Documentation, New GLEP submissions; IN_P; arthurzam:glep
[2024-07-21T22:11:26+03:00] <@arthurzam> So I forgot there is next step after Accepted status, can we make it FINAL now?
[2024-07-21T22:11:54+03:00] <@arthurzam> soko (p.g.o) already uses the new format to render, and pkgdev mask uses the new format to create masks
[2024-07-21T22:12:00+03:00] <@robbat2> the last message seemed to be a concern that it wasn't fully implemented?
[2024-07-21T22:12:15+03:00] <@sam_> are all entries in profiles/ compliant?
[2024-07-21T22:12:42+03:00] <@arthurzam> sam_: not all, only in profiles/packages.mask - you want all of them to comply?
[2024-07-21T22:12:50+03:00] <@arthurzam> robbat2: only pkgcheck is missing to hard enforce it
[2024-07-21T22:13:01+03:00] <@sam_> recursive package.mask for now ideally
[2024-07-21T22:13:28+03:00] <@arthurzam> ok I see my homework until next council meeting
[2024-07-21T22:13:30+03:00] <@robbat2> should we defer or just mark final and give pkgcheck authors a bug to enable enforcement
[2024-07-21T22:13:41+03:00] <@sam_> I think the latter is ok
[2024-07-21T22:14:07+03:00] <@ulm> either way wfm, slight preference for the former
[2024-07-21T22:14:18+03:00] <@robbat2> i think final & bug is good enough, that's our intent, and the tooling can start to enforce it more over time
[2024-07-21T22:14:24+03:00] <@robbat2> eventual consistency
[2024-07-21T22:14:53+03:00] <@arthurzam> So a motion:
[2024-07-21T22:14:53+03:00] <@arthurzam> 3. Mark GLEP 84 as final, open bug for pkgcheck to enforce the GLEP, and open bug to convert all profiles/**/package.mask
[2024-07-21T22:15:03+03:00] <@robbat2> seconded
[2024-07-21T22:15:09+03:00] -*- mgorny yes
[2024-07-21T22:15:14+03:00] -*- robbat2 aye
[2024-07-21T22:15:16+03:00] -*- sam_ yes
[2024-07-21T22:15:17+03:00] -*- ulm yes
[2024-07-21T22:15:24+03:00] -*- arthurzam yes
[2024-07-21T22:15:33+03:00] -*- soap yes
[2024-07-21T22:15:58+03:00] <@robbat2> dilfridge: ?
[2024-07-21T22:16:08+03:00] -*- dilfridge yes
[2024-07-21T22:16:13+03:00] <@arthurzam> 7 yes, passed
[2024-07-21T22:16:17+03:00] <@ulm> so action item for GLEP editors to mark it as final
[2024-07-21T22:16:28+03:00] <@arthurzam> I'll open the bugs after meeting, ulm could you handle the GLEP side?
[2024-07-21T22:16:32+03:00] <@ulm> sure
[2024-07-21T22:16:43+03:00] <@arthurzam> So next one:
[2024-07-21T22:16:51+03:00] <@arthurzam> 4. Status of architectures https://marc.info/?l=gentoo-project&m=171995035718027&w=2
[2024-07-21T22:17:08+03:00] <@arthurzam> Here there would be multiple votes, let's start from first one:
[2024-07-21T22:17:16+03:00] <@arthurzam> 4a. alpha - make profile stable
[2024-07-21T22:17:43+03:00] -*- robbat2 aye
[2024-07-21T22:17:45+03:00] <@arthurzam> matoro handles alpha very well, is responsive, and tree of deps is nearly done (breaks because of us continuing to add dependencies)
[2024-07-21T22:17:58+03:00] <@dilfridge> yes please
[2024-07-21T22:18:06+03:00] -*- arthurzam yes
[2024-07-21T22:18:10+03:00] -*- dilfridge yes
[2024-07-21T22:18:17+03:00] -*- sam_ yes
[2024-07-21T22:18:21+03:00] <@mgorny> arthurzam: just to clarify: we are talking about "stable" profile and not "stable" keywords
[2024-07-21T22:18:23+03:00] -*- ulm yes
[2024-07-21T22:18:30+03:00] <@dilfridge> exactly
[2024-07-21T22:18:33+03:00] -*- mgorny yes (provided it passes pkgcheck)
[2024-07-21T22:18:34+03:00] <@arthurzam> mgorny: yes, ~alpha but consistent dep tree
[2024-07-21T22:18:38+03:00] -*- soap yes
[2024-07-21T22:18:45+03:00] <@arthurzam> We will do it only after full tree is done
[2024-07-21T22:18:57+03:00] <@arthurzam> 7 yes, passed
[2024-07-21T22:19:08+03:00] <@arthurzam> I'll contact matoro with the action items for that
[2024-07-21T22:19:18+03:00] <@arthurzam> 4b. ia64 - deprecate arch
[2024-07-21T22:19:28+03:00] <@dilfridge> unrelated and unreleased:
[2024-07-21T22:19:28+03:00] <@dilfridge> >>> Completed testing sys-libs/glibc-2.40
[2024-07-21T22:19:40+03:00] <@arthurzam> for ia64, I think deprecation period of 1 year
[2024-07-21T22:19:44+03:00] <@arthurzam> does is sound fine?
[2024-07-21T22:19:51+03:00] <@dilfridge> yes
[2024-07-21T22:19:53+03:00] <@mgorny> it's dead, jim
[2024-07-21T22:20:06+03:00] <@ulm> this is an ex-parrot
[2024-07-21T22:20:12+03:00] <@robbat2> i think it could be shorter - given the devbox problems
[2024-07-21T22:20:18+03:00] <@robbat2> stop dragging it out
[2024-07-21T22:20:41+03:00] <@arthurzam> ulm: dilfridge: any thoughts against it? I don't care and will gladly even do it one day
[2024-07-21T22:20:42+03:00] <@dilfridge> the last stages are from april
[2024-07-21T22:21:15+03:00] <@sam_> just kill it, sorry
[2024-07-21T22:21:15+03:00] <@ulm> maybe not tomorrow, give it a month or so
[2024-07-21T22:21:25+03:00] <@sam_> give it a month, do a news item
[2024-07-21T22:21:34+03:00] <@dilfridge> shrug, there are no real reasons to do shorter - if there is still anyone using it it would be nicer to use the normal timing
[2024-07-21T22:21:53+03:00] <@dilfridge> but I'm fine with it either way
[2024-07-21T22:21:57+03:00] <@arthurzam> ok, so the motion: "ia64 - deprecate arch, one month period after news-item"
[2024-07-21T22:22:05+03:00] -*- arthurzam yes
[2024-07-21T22:22:08+03:00] <@robbat2> does killing it earlier make any processes easier?
[2024-07-21T22:22:16+03:00] <@sam_> it means devs stop wasting time on kwreqs and such
[2024-07-21T22:22:22+03:00] <@arthurzam> Less keywording bugs
[2024-07-21T22:22:34+03:00] <@sam_> and imo that's more value add than keeping it for a year
[2024-07-21T22:22:47+03:00] <@robbat2> agreed
[2024-07-21T22:23:10+03:00] <@ulm> we could do the wikipedia thing, everyone states a time period and we take the median
[2024-07-21T22:23:22+03:00] <@soap> ok 1 -year
[2024-07-21T22:23:27+03:00] <@soap> ok -1 year :D
[2024-07-21T22:23:35+03:00] <@arthurzam> nice
[2024-07-21T22:23:49+03:00] <@arthurzam> let's go with 1 month - this is dead
[2024-07-21T22:23:51+03:00] <@robbat2> 1 month
[2024-07-21T22:23:55+03:00] <@soap> 1 month, yup
[2024-07-21T22:24:03+03:00] <@ulm> 3 months
[2024-07-21T22:24:12+03:00] <@mgorny> 3 months
[2024-07-21T22:24:27+03:00] <@dilfridge> EDONTCARE
[2024-07-21T22:24:47+03:00] <@sam_> 1 month
[2024-07-21T22:24:48+03:00] <@arthurzam> median results in 1 month?
[2024-07-21T22:25:13+03:00] <@arthurzam> yep, python confirms it
[2024-07-21T22:25:15+03:00] <@arthurzam> motion: "ia64 - deprecate arch, one month period after news-item"
[2024-07-21T22:25:17+03:00] <@ulm> one vote missing?
[2024-07-21T22:25:21+03:00] <@mgorny> median falls between 1 and 3, so we ought to take avg? xP
[2024-07-21T22:25:33+03:00] <@mgorny> ah, sorry, didn't notice sam
[2024-07-21T22:25:36+03:00] -*- dilfridge abstain
[2024-07-21T22:25:46+03:00] -*- arthurzam yes
[2024-07-21T22:25:50+03:00] -*- robbat2 aye
[2024-07-21T22:25:56+03:00] -*- mgorny yes
[2024-07-21T22:25:57+03:00] -*- soap yes
[2024-07-21T22:25:57+03:00] <@ulm> yeah, median is 1 month
[2024-07-21T22:25:59+03:00] -*- ulm yes
[2024-07-21T22:26:26+03:00] <@arthurzam> sam_?
[2024-07-21T22:26:32+03:00] -*- sam_ yes
[2024-07-21T22:26:36+03:00] <@arthurzam> 6 yes, 1 abstain => motion passed
[2024-07-21T22:26:48+03:00] <@arthurzam> I'll work with dilfridge and sam_ to deprecate it correctly
[2024-07-21T22:26:52+03:00] <@sam_> :)
[2024-07-21T22:27:06+03:00] <@arthurzam> 4c. ppc64/32ul - shorten deprecation period
[2024-07-21T22:27:33+03:00] <@arthurzam> I learned not long ago that we have only 17.* profiles which are deprecated for 2 years - can we finally cleanup them?
[2024-07-21T22:27:48+03:00] <@robbat2> arthurzam: let's hold that for new business?
[2024-07-21T22:27:52+03:00] <@arthurzam> This would really help cleanup of ppc64 profiles internal
[2024-07-21T22:27:54+03:00] <@robbat2> and stick to these votes first
[2024-07-21T22:28:20+03:00] <@arthurzam> robbat2: I meant for ppc64/32-bit userland ?
[2024-07-21T22:28:24+03:00] <@arthurzam> robbat2: what do you mean?
[2024-07-21T22:28:49+03:00] <@robbat2> "we have only 17.* profiles which are deprecated for 2 years - can we finally cleanup them?" => that should be new business
[2024-07-21T22:28:58+03:00] <@robbat2> and keep on track w/ 4.c.
[2024-07-21T22:29:26+03:00] <@arthurzam> help
[2024-07-21T22:29:29+03:00] <@dilfridge> arthurzam: you mean these here? default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/17.0/32bit-userland
[2024-07-21T22:29:34+03:00] <@arthurzam> dilfridge: yes
[2024-07-21T22:29:46+03:00] <@dilfridge> they dont exist in 23.0, correct
[2024-07-21T22:30:21+03:00] <@dilfridge> and the whole default/linux/powerpc tree should be long gone
[2024-07-21T22:30:31+03:00] <@arthurzam> So the deprecation of those profiles isn't exactly defined - can we shorten it to cleanup or 1 month?
[2024-07-21T22:30:36+03:00] <@sam_> I was just writing that out
[2024-07-21T22:30:48+03:00] <@sam_> they've been deprecated forever, and in 4.c, arthur is asking what to do about it
[2024-07-21T22:30:52+03:00] <@dilfridge> in favour of default/linux/{ppc,ppc64,ppc64le}
[2024-07-21T22:31:21+03:00] <@sam_> they should be fine to yank
[2024-07-21T22:31:31+03:00] <@arthurzam> ok, so no need to vote, sorry :)
[2024-07-21T22:31:54+03:00] <@arthurzam> next one:
[2024-07-21T22:31:55+03:00] <@ulm> why is it ppc64 when it's 32 bit userland? we don't do that for x86/amd64, correct?
[2024-07-21T22:32:17+03:00] <@soap> because these are all weird arches that had weird initial userlands
[2024-07-21T22:32:32+03:00] <@arthurzam> 4d. sparc32 - deprecate profiles
[2024-07-21T22:32:32+03:00] <@arthurzam> I want to request 3 month deprecation period
[2024-07-21T22:32:32+03:00] <@dilfridge> ulm: that's why it should be removed
[2024-07-21T22:32:54+03:00] <@sam_> for sparc, 3 months or maybe 6 months, yeah, as people will need time to reinstall and there's i think at least 2 installs i know f
[2024-07-21T22:33:04+03:00] <@dilfridge> so about 4c still
[2024-07-21T22:33:16+03:00] <@arthurzam> yeah, let's still be on 4c, to not complicate
[2024-07-21T22:33:20+03:00] <@dilfridge> the profiles are only deprecated since 1/June
[2024-07-21T22:34:21+03:00] <@dilfridge> however, even for 17.0 there should be an alternative
[2024-07-21T22:34:23+03:00] <@dilfridge> ?
[2024-07-21T22:34:28+03:00] <@sam_> right -- 4c, I don't think there's anything to do, it's all arch team prorogative and it's been deprecated since years ago by gyak
[2024-07-21T22:34:35+03:00] <@sam_> it's not killing an arch entirely or anything
[2024-07-21T22:34:40+03:00] <@arthurzam> dilfridge: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=7587ed10a9cd74ed4d8c6ac7e283dcee3aa20967
[2024-07-21T22:34:43+03:00] <@dilfridge> ok wfm
[2024-07-21T22:35:10+03:00] <@arthurzam> ok, back to track:
[2024-07-21T22:35:10+03:00] <@arthurzam> 4d. sparc32 - deprecate profiles
[2024-07-21T22:35:10+03:00] <@arthurzam> I want to request 3 month deprecation period
[2024-07-21T22:35:14+03:00] <@dilfridge> also, arch team can decide that
[2024-07-21T22:35:17+03:00] <@sam_> yeah
[2024-07-21T22:35:31+03:00] <@dilfridge> arthurzam: imagine someone is out there using it :P
[2024-07-21T22:35:45+03:00] <@arthurzam> So 6 month?
[2024-07-21T22:35:50+03:00] <@dilfridge> in the land of fairies and unicorns
[2024-07-21T22:35:57+03:00] <@sam_> let's do 6 please
[2024-07-21T22:35:57+03:00] <@dilfridge> yeah
[2024-07-21T22:36:00+03:00] <@sam_> these machines are a PITA to handle
[2024-07-21T22:36:10+03:00] <@sam_> nobody will be eager to reinstall in a hurry
[2024-07-21T22:36:21+03:00] <@arthurzam> ok, so motion: " sparc32 - deprecate profiles, 6 month period after new item"
[2024-07-21T22:36:28+03:00] -*- arthurzam yes
[2024-07-21T22:36:31+03:00] -*- sam_ yes
[2024-07-21T22:36:34+03:00] -*- soap yes
[2024-07-21T22:36:37+03:00] -*- dilfridge yes
[2024-07-21T22:36:38+03:00] -*- ulm yes
[2024-07-21T22:36:43+03:00] -*- robbat2 aye
[2024-07-21T22:37:07+03:00] <@arthurzam> mgorny?
[2024-07-21T22:37:20+03:00] -*- mgorny yes
[2024-07-21T22:37:21+03:00] <@mgorny> sorry
[2024-07-21T22:37:37+03:00] <@arthurzam> 7 yes => motion passed
[2024-07-21T22:37:37+03:00] <@arthurzam> Will handle with dilfridge and sam
[2024-07-21T22:37:51+03:00] <@dilfridge> easy
[2024-07-21T22:37:52+03:00] <@arthurzam> 4e. s390 not s390x - deprecate profiles
[2024-07-21T22:38:05+03:00] <@arthurzam> I think a short notice here is fine?
[2024-07-21T22:38:16+03:00] <@sam_> even IBM seem to think literally 0 users exist
[2024-07-21T22:38:17+03:00] <@dilfridge> so the only reason for the existence of s390 31bit is the support of legacy software
[2024-07-21T22:38:26+03:00] <@dilfridge> kernel has been 64bit only for ages
[2024-07-21T22:38:38+03:00] <@arthurzam> so 1 month just for protocol?
[2024-07-21T22:38:46+03:00] <@dilfridge> I'd do the same 6 months, to be nice
[2024-07-21T22:38:50+03:00] <@arthurzam> ok
[2024-07-21T22:38:54+03:00] <@sam_> yeah it costs us nothing there
[2024-07-21T22:39:02+03:00] <@sam_> (same keyword too so not a problem)
[2024-07-21T22:39:09+03:00] <@arthurzam> sam_: it does cost - some ugly profiles between s390x unmask s390
[2024-07-21T22:39:20+03:00] <@sam_> ok, but very little :)
[2024-07-21T22:39:31+03:00] <@sam_> it's not the same as ia64 where you're dealing with rekeywording and such for the most part
[2024-07-21T22:39:42+03:00] <@arthurzam> motion 4e: "s390 not s390x - deprecate profiles, 6 month period after news-item"
[2024-07-21T22:39:42+03:00] <@sam_> also very little seems to break on s390
[2024-07-21T22:39:45+03:00] -*- sam_ yes
[2024-07-21T22:39:46+03:00] -*- arthurzam yes
[2024-07-21T22:39:49+03:00] -*- mgorny yes
[2024-07-21T22:39:50+03:00] -*- dilfridge yes
[2024-07-21T22:39:51+03:00] -*- robbat2 aye
[2024-07-21T22:39:52+03:00] -*- soap yes
[2024-07-21T22:39:57+03:00] -*- ulm yes
[2024-07-21T22:40:07+03:00] <@arthurzam> 7 yes => passed
[2024-07-21T22:40:07+03:00] <@arthurzam> I will handle with dilfridge and sam
[2024-07-21T22:40:17+03:00] <@arthurzam> finally (4) is done
[2024-07-21T22:40:28+03:00] <@arthurzam> 5. Foundation dissolution status update
[2024-07-21T22:40:32+03:00] <@arthurzam> anything new?
[2024-07-21T22:40:33+03:00] <@dilfridge> we can make a front page post for ia64 sparc32 and s390
[2024-07-21T22:40:53+03:00] <@ulm> we have a tracker bug for the various tasks
[2024-07-21T22:40:57+03:00] <@robbat2> ulm has put together a tracker bug - it needs many more entries still
[2024-07-21T22:41:08+03:00] <@arthurzam> link please?
[2024-07-21T22:41:20+03:00] <@robbat2> i am chasing SPI's treasurer about the paypal integration pieces needed to do donations to them directly from our page
[2024-07-21T22:41:29+03:00] <@ulm> arthurzam: it's private ATM, will make it public later
[2024-07-21T22:41:36+03:00] <@arthurzam> no problem
[2024-07-21T22:41:39+03:00] <@robbat2> https://bugs.gentoo.org/936211 is the tracker
[2024-07-21T22:41:44+03:00] <@ulm> after we have sorted out what can be public
[2024-07-21T22:41:58+03:00] <@robbat2> I think the tracker should be public - and decide individual items being public
[2024-07-21T22:42:21+03:00] <@ulm> any objections against public tracker?
[2024-07-21T22:42:29+03:00] <@dilfridge> none here
[2024-07-21T22:42:37+03:00] <@arthurzam> ok from me
[2024-07-21T22:42:40+03:00] <@sam_> ok
[2024-07-21T22:43:30+03:00] <@ulm> seems not
[2024-07-21T22:43:42+03:00] <@ulm> public then
[2024-07-21T22:43:42+03:00] <@arthurzam> anything more? I do want to thank everyone working on it :)
[2024-07-21T22:44:22+03:00] <@arthurzam> ok, let's advance
[2024-07-21T22:44:26+03:00] <@arthurzam> 6. Missing meeting logs and summaries
[2024-07-21T22:44:31+03:00] <@dilfridge> ...
[2024-07-21T22:44:42+03:00] <@arthurzam> Hey, even raw logs are missing :(
[2024-07-21T22:44:50+03:00] <@sam_> I've got a draft for my summaries open, I'll finish it today/tomorrow, promise
[2024-07-21T22:45:02+03:00] <@sam_> it just involved the huge AI discussion and I was putting it off
[2024-07-21T22:45:08+03:00] <@dilfridge> soon
[2024-07-21T22:45:41+03:00] <@arthurzam> Can we at least put raw logs soon, as well as participants?
[2024-07-21T22:46:09+03:00] <@dilfridge> middle of the week
[2024-07-21T22:46:18+03:00] <@arthurzam> ok, thank you
[2024-07-21T22:46:34+03:00] <@arthurzam> 7. Open bugs with council involvement
[2024-07-21T22:47:00+03:00] <@arthurzam> will skip that foundation tracker as discussed above
[2024-07-21T22:47:06+03:00] <@arthurzam> bug 925014
[2024-07-21T22:47:06+03:00] <willikins> arthurzam: https://bugs.gentoo.org/925014 "PR services lacking developer redundancy"; Community Relations, User Relations; CONF; ajak:pr
[2024-07-21T22:47:37+03:00] <@arthurzam> Any update?
[2024-07-21T22:47:50+03:00] <@arthurzam> Or, what are we missing to close it?
[2024-07-21T22:48:38+03:00] <@ulm> the XMPP channel still has only one responsible person, I think?
[2024-07-21T22:48:50+03:00] <@ulm> who doens't reply in a timely manner
[2024-07-21T22:49:02+03:00] <@ulm> *doesn't
[2024-07-21T22:49:13+03:00] <@dilfridge> this is an eternal tracker, let's just revisit it next month
[2024-07-21T22:49:46+03:00] <@arthurzam> ok, just note that I've little knowledge on the PR side of gentoo, so will follow you
[2024-07-21T22:49:50+03:00] <@ulm> yes, too early to close IMHO
[2024-07-21T22:50:06+03:00] <@ulm> things are still not in a perfect shape
[2024-07-21T22:50:07+03:00] <@arthurzam> great, deferred to next meeting
[2024-07-21T22:50:13+03:00] <@arthurzam> next one, bug 801499
[2024-07-21T22:50:14+03:00] <willikins> arthurzam: https://bugs.gentoo.org/801499 "Approach Nitrokey for Nitrokey 3 upgrade"; Gentoo Foundation, Proposals; CONF; sam:trustees
[2024-07-21T22:50:29+03:00] <@robbat2> nitrokey: no response from their CEO
[2024-07-21T22:50:32+03:00] <@soap> I think we've buried NK3
[2024-07-21T22:50:35+03:00] <@arthurzam> have we tried to contact yubikey?
[2024-07-21T22:50:42+03:00] <@soap> the UX is terrible
[2024-07-21T22:51:04+03:00] <@arthurzam> soap: talking about YK or NK3?
[2024-07-21T22:51:13+03:00] <@soap> arthurzam: NK3, YK is fine
[2024-07-21T22:51:40+03:00] <@robbat2> contacting yubikey was proposed by the council before I was a member; I don't have any reason to oppose it from the Foundation side, but I do want to focus on dissolution
[2024-07-21T22:51:45+03:00] <@robbat2> so I ask that somebody else take that on
[2024-07-21T22:52:11+03:00] <@arthurzam> is it a EU or US firm?
[2024-07-21T22:52:20+03:00] <@soap> YK?
[2024-07-21T22:52:23+03:00] <@arthurzam> yes
[2024-07-21T22:52:23+03:00] <@soap> its a mixed one
[2024-07-21T22:52:26+03:00] <@soap> SE/US
[2024-07-21T22:52:50+03:00] <@robbat2> Swedish originally
[2024-07-21T22:53:27+03:00] <@arthurzam> soap: ulm: could one of you do it and contact them?
[2024-07-21T22:53:54+03:00] <@soap> ok, what exactly do we want? like a semi sponsorship or what?
[2024-07-21T22:53:57+03:00] <@robbat2> https://www.yubico.com/products/yubikey-as-a-service/ min buyin is 500 units for the public program
[2024-07-21T22:54:10+03:00] <@robbat2> but I don't know about their non-profit side
[2024-07-21T22:54:35+03:00] <@soap> robbat2: what was the gain for us from NK? I mean, we still paid for them?
[2024-07-21T22:55:07+03:00] <@robbat2> roughly the same as the yubikey as a service => bulk discounts, fufillment by nitrokey, billed to foundation
[2024-07-21T22:55:20+03:00] <@arthurzam> I've found https://www.yubico.com/why-yubico/secure-it-forward/
[2024-07-21T22:56:25+03:00] <@robbat2> you can decide if that fits or if they have some other program
[2024-07-21T22:56:58+03:00] <@robbat2> to return to the original question: should we give nitrokey a formal "no", or wait for yubikey?
[2024-07-21T22:56:59+03:00] <@sam_> I think we can do this out of the meeting?
[2024-07-21T22:57:13+03:00] <@sam_> wait for yubikey, I guess
[2024-07-21T22:57:23+03:00] <@mgorny> let's not burn the bridges
[2024-07-21T22:57:28+03:00] <@sam_> right
[2024-07-21T22:57:44+03:00] <@arthurzam> yes, I agree with sam_. We should wait for YK response, but not close NK yet. Also, we can continue in this channel/in bug outside meeting
[2024-07-21T22:58:01+03:00] <@ulm> +1
[2024-07-21T22:58:17+03:00] <@arthurzam> so, no more open council bugs
[2024-07-21T22:58:20+03:00] <@robbat2> https://www.yubico.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/1617-graphic-YED-Map-updates-2024-r3@2x-100-1-1024x893.jpg <-- this is where yubikey can ship btw
[2024-07-21T22:58:48+03:00] -*- arthurzam is barely in, that small strip
[2024-07-21T22:59:01+03:00] <@arthurzam> 8. Open floor
[2024-07-21T22:59:32+03:00] <@arthurzam> if someone has anything, please put a simple "dot" message and we will wait while you write
[2024-07-21T22:59:37+03:00] <@robbat2> arthurzam: are there *additional* profiles you wish to see deprecated?
[2024-07-21T23:00:16+03:00] <@robbat2> (i have two other open floor questions as well)
[2024-07-21T23:00:54+03:00] <@arthurzam> robbat2: I want ppc and x86 to loose stable arch status, but it needs discussion on ML
[2024-07-21T23:00:54+03:00] <@arthurzam> I also want to split ppc64 ==> ppc64 & ppc64le, and riscv => riscv & riscv32
[2024-07-21T23:01:06+03:00] <@sam_> I've really got to run shortly
[2024-07-21T23:01:12+03:00] <@arthurzam> But all of this for next meeting, too much for this one already
[2024-07-21T23:01:31+03:00] <@robbat2> thanks; those can to the ML
[2024-07-21T23:01:35+03:00] <@soap> arthurzam: stable keywords or stable profile?
[2024-07-21T23:01:45+03:00] <@arthurzam> soap: stable keywords
[2024-07-21T23:01:52+03:00] <@soap> yeah, I'm fine with that
[2024-07-21T23:02:18+03:00] <@robbat2> 2nd question: previously the Foundation had non-trustee Liaison roles, like jmbsvicetto representing infra to reduce conflict of interest in votes
[2024-07-21T23:02:35+03:00] <@robbat2> with the dissolution of the Foundation, would the council take a similar process?
[2024-07-21T23:03:12+03:00] <@ulm> robbat2: what exactly are you asking for? a council infra liaison?
[2024-07-21T23:03:12+03:00] <@robbat2> (so that as the foundation treasurer & infra lead: i didn't both propose spending money, authorize it as a trustee, and action it as treasurer)
[2024-07-21T23:03:28+03:00] <@robbat2> to start a clear question: does the Council see a need for a similar process?
[2024-07-21T23:03:29+03:00] <@sam_> that's a pretty big topic which warrants thought on the ML, not a quick thing, I think
[2024-07-21T23:03:32+03:00] <@mgorny> that doesn't sound like a open floor topic
[2024-07-21T23:03:34+03:00] <@sam_> yeah
[2024-07-21T23:03:42+03:00] <@robbat2> just do you want that as a process, or not
[2024-07-21T23:03:46+03:00] <@robbat2> so that I open the threads
[2024-07-21T23:04:06+03:00] <@arthurzam> I think we should do it. I think we are to close to Council = QA = Infra
[2024-07-21T23:04:09+03:00] <@mgorny> i don't think it's necessary, given that there are 7 people here, and worst case you can abstain
[2024-07-21T23:04:21+03:00] <@sam_> arthurzam: ultimately there's only so many people interesed
[2024-07-21T23:04:23+03:00] <@sam_> please bring it up on the ML
[2024-07-21T23:04:30+03:00] <@sam_> i can't possibly make a judgement this quickly
[2024-07-21T23:04:58+03:00] <@arthurzam> robbat2: when you bring it up in ML, please explain some stuff in simpler words, you sentence above was too English living specific words
[2024-07-21T23:05:25+03:00] <@robbat2> thanks, I will start the discussion on the ML
[2024-07-21T23:05:33+03:00] <@sam_> thx
[2024-07-21T23:05:51+03:00] <@arthurzam> I didn't see any "dot" from anyone else, so I think we are done with open floor
[2024-07-21T23:05:56+03:00] <@robbat2> i'll do simialr for the last item as well
[2024-07-21T23:06:12+03:00] -*- arthurzam bangs the gravel
|